What should an investor verify first?

The specific individuals behind the deals that drove the fund's marketed past results.

Which documents matter most?

Team biographies and tenure records, cross-checked against the deals cited in the track record.

What is the main downside to test?

Assuming a firm's brand name carries the track record even after the people who built it have left.

How should the final decision be made?

Confirm the investment committee structure today matches the one that actually generated past results.

Back to JournalFund Manager Selection and Due Diligence

How to Check Whether a Track Record Is Attributable to the Current Team

Urvashi L1 min read

Understanding the Manager Decision

Investment teams change: partners leave, join from competing firms, or are promoted into deal-making roles they didn't hold when a fund's marketed track record was built. Whether a track record is attributable to today's team is a distinct question from whether the firm's overall numbers look good.

Reading Evidence and Attribution

Ask directly: of the deals that generated the bulk of the fund's marketed return, which specific individuals sourced, negotiated and managed them, and are those individuals still active decision-makers at the firm today, or have they since left, been promoted elsewhere, or become passive?

Where Manager Diligence Breaks

The common failure is assuming a firm's track record automatically transfers to a new fund simply because the same firm name is raising it. If the specific individuals responsible for past results have left or moved into different roles, the new fund is effectively a new, unproven team wearing a familiar brand.

Making the Selection Decision

Before relying on a track record, confirm: the specific names behind the deals that drove past results; their current role and decision-making authority at the firm; whether any departures have occurred since those results were generated; and whether the fund being raised today has the same investment committee structure as the one that produced the marketed numbers.

A track record belongs to the people who built it, not to the letterhead it is printed on.

Key takeaways

A track record is attributable to specific individuals, not automatically to the firm's brand name.
Confirm whether the people behind past results are still active decision-makers today.
A fund raised by the same firm name after key departures is effectively a new, unproven team.
Check whether the investment committee structure today matches the one that produced past results.

More in Fund Manager Selection and Due Diligence

Continue with the other chapters in this module.

Fund Manager Selection and Due DiligenceHow to Select an AIF in IndiaSelecting an AIF in India starts with the category and strategy fit, not the brand name.Fund Manager Selection and Due DiligenceAIF Due-Diligence Checklist Before Investing ₹1 CroreA ₹1 crore AIF commitment is usually a meaningful fraction of an individual investor's liquid net worth, which justifies a structured checklist rather than an informal conversation with a relationship manager.Fund Manager Selection and Due DiligenceHow to Compare Two AIFsComparing two AIFs side by side is only meaningful once strategy, vintage and category are held constant — a Category II private-credit fund from 2022 and a Category I venture fund from 2024 are...